Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Use of Force


Use of force in Policing

I would just like to start my post off by thanking Cst. Rupert Mainke for talking the time for teaching the class about when and how to use reasonable force in policing.

Tonight was interesting for all of us, Rupert began by introducing himself to the class and gave a brief overview of his careers in policing, corrections, probation and the military.

Rupert is very knowledgeable when it comes to how to deal with situations when an officer has to apply a certain degree of force in a certain situation. He talked about two sections of the criminal code such as; section 25 and section 495.

Section 25 of the Criminal Code of Canada provides police officers with authority to use force.

It says that “everyone who is required or authorized by law to do anything in the administration or enforcement of the law is, if he or she acts on reasonable grounds, justified in doing what he or she is required or authorized to do in using as much force as necessary for that purpose”.

We then continued on to a debatable question like “What is excessive force”?

Force is excessive if:
1.     It is grossly disproportionate to the need for action
2.     It is inspired by malice or over aggression
3.     If it shocks the conscience of the courts

An example would be force that is not reasonable or necessary.

A case that we went over in class was Cluett V. the Queen (1985) a somewhat interesting and controversial case that ended in a mentally ill man being killed by police because of the man interfering with traffic.

“It is not possible to lay down any hard and fast role, except the test of reasonableness. If the police officer carry out his own authority acts on reasonable and probable grounds, he is justified in doing what he is required to do and in using as much force necessary”.

One of the most interesting topics (in section 25 of the criminal code) I found to be was “when is it reasonable to shoot someone in the back”It is reasonable to shoot someone in the back when:
1.     Someone who is fleeing after causing or trying to cause fatal injuries to an officer
2.     Someone who is fleeing and is believed to cause serious even fatal harm to the public.

We then discussed section 495 of the Criminal Code; section 495 discusses when a police officer can make an arrest without a warrant.

1)    A peace officer may arrest without a warrant
a     A person who has been caught or has just committed an indictable offence
b        A person whom he finds committing a criminal offence; or
c     A person, in respect of whom he has reasonable grounds to believe that a warrant of arrest of committal, in any form set out in part XXVIII in relation thereto, is in force within the territorial jurisdiction in which the person is found.

After discussing sections in the criminal we then moved on to the six basic principles that underlie the National Use of Force Framework, Use of force options and subject behaviors and how to asses both topics together when dealing with a situation.

The six basic principles that underlie the National use of force framework are:

1)    The primary responsibility of a peace officer is to preserve and protect life.
2)    The primary objective of any use of force is to ensure public safety.
3)    Police officer safety is essential to public safety.
4)    The National use of force Framework does not replace or augment the law: the law speaks for itself.
5)    The National Use of force Framework was constructed in consideration of (federal) statute law and current case law.
6)    The National Use of Force Framework is not intended to dictate policy to any agency.

When an officer is confronted with a situation that must be dealt with extreme care and discretion that officer must go through a 3-step assessment process that involves:

1)    The situation- environment, number of subjects, perceived subjects abilities, knowledge of subject, time and distance, potential attack signs
2)    Subject behaviors- Co-operative, resistant (passive), resistant, (active), assaultive, grievous bodily harm or death
3)    Officer’s perception/tactical considerations- 2 separate factors that may affect the officers overall assessment.

We then ended the class by talking about the 5 Use of Force Options available to police when handling a situation, the options are:

1)    Officer presence
2)    Verbal communication
3)    Physical control
                    Soft
                     Hard
4)    Intermediate Weapons
5)    Lethal force

The officer can apply any one of these “Use of Force Options” to the assessment process, officers are taught when and what to use concerning the situation through the National Use of Force Framework model below.  



Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Tonight Brian had us begin the class with a exercise where a scenario of a police officer telling a civilian that someone dearest to them has passed away suddenly, whether it be a mother, father, etc. He then turned our attention to a very interesting lecture about how to detect a lair. Some of the key indicators to look for in a liar were:

-Physical expression
-Body language
-Emotional gestures & contradictions
-Interactions & reactions
-Verbal context and content
- and they use "just kidding" after stating the confession that is actually what happened believe it or not.

We than participated in another exercise where a police officer got a statement from one of us who pretended to be a car jacker that was caught in a bait car committing multiple offences. I enjoyed the class tonight and I look forward to the class next week with Rupert, on use of force.